I cannot believe all of the negative changes that have been made. Here just some:
* OVER 150 JOBS ELIMINATED – PROVOKING UNIONIZATION
* ABOLISH TRIBAL EMPLOYMENT TERMINATION APPEALS
* ABOLISH TRIBAL EMPLOYEE REVERSE PREFERENCE FOR LAYOFFS
* SUSPENSION OF ANTI-RETRIBUTION POLICY IN EMPLOYMENT
* ELIMINATING TRIBAL MATCH ON EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTIONS
* THE ELDER CHECKS REDUCED BY $1,000, TRIBAL COUPLES REDUCED BY $2,000
* ELIMINATE THE TRIBAL CHILDREN'S CHRISTMAS PARTY
* ELIMINATE TRIBAL FOSTER KIDS CHRISTMAS PRESENTS FROM TRIBAL DOLLARS
* ELIMINATE THE ELDER'S THANKSGIVING DINNER
* ELIMINATE TRIBAL MEMBER MEETINGS IN EACH UNIT MONTHLY AND OUTSIDE OF THE UP
* CUTTING OUT A MEAL A WEEK FOR OUR ELDER CONGREGATE MEAL PROGRAM
* ELIMINATE YOUTH SPORTS SPONSORSHIPS (INCLUDING DRIVER’S LICENSE, ETC.)
* REQUIRE A NEW FEE FOR OUR HUNTING AND FISHING LICENSES
* REQUIRE A NEW FEE FOR APPLYING FOR THE BLOOD QUANTUM CERTIFICATION
* REQUIRE A NEW FEE FOR YOUR MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL CARD
* ELIMINATE THE INCENTIVE AWARD FOR EMPLOYEES
* CUT OUT 500 OF OUR TRIBAL COLLEGE STUDENTS FROM RECEIVING ANY ASSISTANCE
* LOSSES AT GREEKTOWN EXCEEDING $142 MILLION SINCE THE 2008 ELECTION
* CONTINUED LOSS OF UP GAMING MARKET SHARE
* CHAIR POSITION REDUCED TO PART TIME JOB, WITH FULL TIME PAY & BENEFITS.
THE LIST GOES ON AND ON.
CONCENTRATING POWER: BACK TO AN AUTOCRATIC GOVERNMENT?
Regarding the agenda for Tuesday, I have noticed a trend toward centralizing power in the position of Chair. Several resolutions delegate the authority and even provide that in the future, approval will not even come to the Tribal Board. Here are some examples:
In the past, the Board used to vote on our casino liquor licenses for each casino. The resolution on the agenda delegates this to the Chair from here forward.
The change in the retirement plan is another example. First, there is no indication that this was put out for bids. It gives the Chair carte blanche authority to switch every employee's retirement savings from one plan to another. It says nothing about an articulation of benefits which is usually required and shared with those it will affect so they can decide if it is good for them. Currently, employees can select a menu of options of where to put their retirement savings. The new plan does not say that.
I wonder if the McCoy Administration plans to use these funds to invest in Greektown which would likely mean their entire retirement savings could be wiped out. What is the balance of the Elder fund by the way? Is any of it left? If loaned to Greektown, and since GT is in Chapter 11, what is our priority for being repaid? Are all other creditors ahead of us? Will Ted Gatzaros, the greek, get this money first?
BURYING THE DETAILS IN ATTACHMENTS TO STIFLE YOUR RIGHT TO REFERENDUM?
Also, there are several resolutions that reference an attached plan. Clearly, this is being done so that members don't know what they are voting on and are less likely to put this to referendum. If Members do gather the signatures, they will likely fail anyway because the language in the resolution is so vague that the Members won't realize it should be challenged and are instead tricked into supporting its passage.
Changing the Indirect Cost rate is an example. In the past, the resolution used to spell out what the changes are and what specific numbers are changing. Again, the devil is in the details are buried in the attachment.
IS AN INCREASE IN RESIDENT RENTAL RATES IN THE PLAN?
The Change to the Housing Plan Year document without explaining how this will affect residents is of concern. The Housing Commission and Authority are required by federal law to hold public hearings. Did they? Even if they did, why not list out what these changes are so if there is something adverse, Tribal housing residents can challenge the decision via right of referendum. An example, in 2001, the Housing Authority (staff) proposed to raise all residents by 33%. I was a Housing Commissioner then as was Dan Tadgerson. We teamed up to read through federal regulations and discovered that several individuals (including Jolene Nertoli's the Housing Director’s children) were living in Tribal housing and paying the same rent as poor people when they were not low income. We challenged the proposed changes at a Board meeting and got a different plan passed that required those who were not low income to pay market rent while low income members paid a minimal rent. This proposal balanced out financially with the more disastrous proposal put forward by staff. If we had not been able to see the details, we would never have been able to challenge this decision.
WHO IS CUT OUT ON TRIBAL HEALTH COVERAGE THIS TIME?
The change to the Health Bylaws claims to just be a name change but again, it references an attachment. What is of concern here is did they reduce eligibility for Priority 1-A? Did they eliminate the appeals procedure? Are Elders cut out of the plan? Are college students cut out of the plan?
SHARING YOUR CONFIDENTIAL MEMBERSHIP INFORMATION WITH OUTSIDERS!
Finally, the Request for Tribal Assistance - BIA, will give our Membership list to the BIA. They don't specify what the purpose for this is. This list is intended to be private. The local BIA office has been trying to get their hands on our list for years. They claim it is for calculating blood quantum but that is our sovereign right to maintain this information within the Tribe. This is one that should certainly be submitted to a referendum. As a sovereign nation, we should not have to provide our list to the BIA. Are you comfortable with sharing your Membership information (any level of information) with the BIA?
UPDATES:
Again, I will try to provide objective updates without opinions. Thanks.
Please circulate to other Tribal Members or ask them to
provide their emails for updates directly.
Download Tribal Board Agenda for next Tuesday - 4/7/09